Droit - Dissertation APK

INTRODUCTION
The immediate objective of any student is passing exams and consequently to graduate. Whatever respectable these concerns deserve to be relativized especially for a student of law.
No doubt the degree is it the official attestation of the reality of certain knowledge. As such, it constitutes the access key to the judiciary, to the bars, departmental offices (bailiffs, notaries and auctioneers Commissioner) as well as many administrative careers (civil administrator, labor director, inspector finance, customs, taxation, foreign affairs advisor etc). But watch closely, passing exams and graduation are not an end in itself. Therefore they should not be the only purpose of legal studies because there is not enough you can become a doctor, we need to succeed. And it is here that the requirement poses certain qualities that the law student must acquire during his stay in the faculty.
What are these qualities? We will retain three that seem essential:
The lawyer must seek knowledge:
The law is too broad science to a human brain can assimilate a whole. It is therefore necessary that the lawyer know at any time how and where to find items that help provide adequate answers to the questions before it. Or learn to research is a science to acquire. It takes constant practice to which the student is invited.
The lawyer must know expose a question:
This is an essential quality without which no one can succeed. This assertion stems from the idea that every legal issue is complex. We must unravel it, break it down, simplify and rebuild then building a plan to the strict and strong faith. The time spent in search of the plane, however long it is never time wasted. Also, is it through this exercise that the lawyer brings his light and his science: he must know clearly and know why build a plan, quality without which there can be no value knowledge.
The lawyer should know discuss:
Actually all the issues encountered in the field of law are questionable. Discussing is knowing the authorities find arguments to convince the listener; is knowing demonstrate a coherent approach the accuracy of the view that we defend and weaknesses of the opposing argument. Law student must appropriate the words of Professor Mazeaud:
"The" gift "of conviction as the" gift "of clarity is gained through work. "
Beyond these individual requirements, it must be remembered that if the law is not an art, it is a science. As science it has its methodological requirements which are also needed when it comes to constitutional law.
Indeed, like other legal disciplines, constitutional law always puts the student in the presence of one of the following exercises: essay, text commentary, case comment and practical case. And each type of exercise, the way forward includes specific elements to be in this review.

essay:
The essay is the type of the most current year. It is not a restitution of the course but a demonstration whose purpose is certainly to present a subject coherently.
In the presence of such exercise, the student must necessarily bring dual evidence:
He understood the subject
He is able to present an orderly manner the essential knowledge that bring it.